Negotiations between the two sides over a withdrawal have dragged out since 2005. Jan. 9 this year, will represent the third deadline negotiated under the Comprehensive Peace Agreement reached in 2005 between Khartoum and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement (SPLM), which calls for government troops to withdraw from the South; the previous deadlines were in July 2007 and December 2007. To justify missing the earlier deadlines and keeping units of the Sudanese armed forces in several southern states, Khartoum complained of inadequate transportation and ill-prepared replacement security forces.
Similar excuses probably will be voiced again, enabling Khartoum to leave thousands of troops in the country’s oil-producing region. Most of Sudan’s oil wealth is concentrated in Unity state, but oil reserves also are spread out through much of southern Sudan — as are Khartoum’s forces — in states including Western Bahr al-Ghazal, Northern Bahr al-Ghazal and Warab. Unity state alone produces an estimated 80 percent of the country’s 500,000 barrels of oil per day and, not coincidentally, hosts thousands of Khartoum’s forces.While some troops in non-oil producing states might be repositioned, Khartoum most likely never will voluntarily yield control of the nation’s oil region to the SPLM’s armed faction, the Sudan People’s Liberation Army (SPLA). At best, Khartoum will cooperate in joint patrols with specially trained SPLA units — whose commanders Khartoum can control. Training SPLA units to Khartoum’s standards will provide another possible delay for a southern withdrawal, since Khartoum always changes those standards.
Khartoum faces several insurgent threats, most notably in its Darfur region but also including tensions with the SPLA — which have not entirely dissipated, despite a tenuous peace agreement. Darfur’s rebel groups include the Justice and Equality Movement (JEM) and the Sudanese Liberation Army-Unity faction. These groups have attacked government and African Union targets in Darfur and have threatened to attack oil installations bordering Darfur, mainly Chinese facilities.
China’s presence in Africa seems to depend on the rebels’ ability to eventually step up the scale of their attacks to a point at which Chinese companies’ operating and oil-extraction activities are stopped or significantly slowed. The worst incident to date was the April 24 attack against a Chinese oil exploration facility in Ethiopia, where nine Chinese workers died. The Chinese did not withdraw from Ethiopia after the attack. Given that the Sudan-based energy assets in question are not exploration, but actual oil-extraction facilities already in operation, providing 35,000 barrels a day, China’s incentives to wait out the turbulence in Sudan are even higher.
Under pressure to defend against these insurgent threats, Khartoum is unlikely to yield the responsibility of protecting oil facilities to the Government of South Sudan — especially when the latter’s desires for greater autonomy and a larger share of oil revenues run contrary to Khartoum’s interests.
On 19 Dec. 2007, for example a The Justice and Equality Movement, a Darfuri rebel group, has claimed responsibility for simultaneous attacks against Sudan’s armed forces in Darfur and against the country’s Defra oil field.A few thousand members of the Sudanese armed forces might be redeployed northward as a gesture of good faith in the face of the Jan. 9 withdrawal deadline. But those troops likely will be found in noncritical (e.g., non-oil producing) southern states. Khartoum will never willingly cede control of the oil-producing states.